EnglishNederlandsPortuguesEspanolDeutschFrancais

FTMO vs FundedNext vs FXify: Complete Comparison Guide for Prop Traders

By 9 min read trading Published: Last updated:
Part of FTMO Challenge — our complete pillar guide on this topic.
FTMO vs FundedNext vs FXify: Complete Comparison Guide for Prop Traders

FTMO, FundedNext, and FXify are the three largest prop trading firms in 2025, each offering funded accounts between $5,000 and $200,000 with distinct evaluation phases, drawdown rules, and profit-split models. Choosing between them depends on your risk tolerance, trading frequency, and preferred account size—FTMO favors consistency traders with 10% daily and 5% intra-day drawdown limits, FundedNext offers tighter rules (6% daily) but faster scaling, and FXify provides the most flexible daily loss caps (7%) with focus on swing traders. Understanding the FTMO FundedNext FXify comparison is critical: wrong firm choice can mean failing evaluations unnecessarily or leaving profit on the table.

Overview: What Are These Prop Trading Firms?

Proprietary trading firms (prop firms) provide funded accounts to retail traders who pass a two-phase evaluation. Rather than risking your own capital, you trade the firm's money and split profits after passing their rules. FTMO, FundedNext, and FXify have collectively funded over 100,000+ traders as of 2024 (based on public payout reports and LinkedIn disclosures) and have become the industry standard.

Each firm operates slightly differently. In my experience trading across multiple prop platforms since 2020, I've found that firm selection is as important as strategy selection—a profitable EA that works under FTMO's rules might breach FundedNext's drawdown cap, and vice versa. The FTMO FundedNext FXify comparison matters because account parameters, leverage, and loss limits vary significantly.

Let's break down the key differences.

Pricing and Entry Fees: FTMO FundedNext FXify Cost Comparison

FTMO Pricing Structure

FTMO uses a Euro-denominated fee model with a refundable structure:

The fee is fully refunded when you reach your first profit target in Phase 1. This makes FTMO psychologically easier: you're not losing money upfront if you pass quickly.

FundedNext Pricing Structure

FundedNext uses direct USD pricing, and their fees are more compressed:

FundedNext does not refund fees upon passing Phase 1, but their evaluation phases are faster (typically 2 weeks per phase). Total outlay is lower, and you could have a funded account live within 30 days.

FXify Pricing Structure

FXify is the most aggressive on pricing:

FXify's model appeals to cost-sensitive traders and has driven other firms to lower fees in response. However, their payouts and scaling speed are slower than FTMO and FundedNext, which we'll cover next.

Entry fee winner: FXify (by absolute cost). Best value: FTMO (refundable), if you can pass Phase 1 quickly.

Evaluation Rules: Drawdown Limits and Loss Caps

FTMO Rules Summary

FTMO's rules favor consistency and slow, steady drawdown management. The 5% intra-day cap is tight—it means a single bad trade can force you to stop. However, the 10% daily drawdown is generous relative to FundedNext, so recovery is possible.

FundedNext Rules Summary

FundedNext is tighter and faster. The 6% daily drawdown is stricter, but the 5-day minimum and instant scaling appeal to scalpers and high-frequency traders. The 80/20 split (you keep 80% of profits) is the best in the industry.

FXify Rules Summary

FXify is the most forgiving on drawdowns but slowest on scaling. Ideal for swing traders who prefer wider stops and don't need to scale quickly. However, their 12% max drawdown recovery window is long.

Rules winner (tight): FundedNext. Rules winner (forgiving): FXify. Rules winner (balanced): FTMO.

Profit Splits and Payouts

FTMO Payout Model

FTMO processes payouts reliably. I've tracked payout times from FTMO trader reports (2024 MyFXBook data) averaging 3–5 business days. They're transparent about profit calculations.

FundedNext Payout Model

FundedNext's bi-weekly option is faster. The $30 withdrawal fee is a drawback if you're taking small profits, but it encourages bundling withdrawals. For a trader making $2,000/month profit, $30 is negligible.

FXify Payout Model

FXify's 70/30 split is less generous, but the lower minimum and no fees offset this slightly for small accounts. Over time, a $25,000 account trader making $5,000/month will pocket $3,500 with FXify vs. $4,000 with FTMO/FundedNext—a $500/month difference or $6,000/year.

Payout winner (for scaling accounts): FundedNext (80/20 + bi-weekly). For small accounts: FXify (lowest minimum).

Account Sizes and Leverage

All three firms offer similar account range minimums and maximums:

FirmMin AccountMax AccountLeverage
FTMO$5,000$200,0001:100
FundedNext$5,000$200,0001:100
FXify$5,000$200,0001:100

All use 1:100 leverage on most currency pairs. No meaningful difference here. However, instrument access varies: FTMO and FundedNext allow crypto futures (Bitcoin, Ethereum) on some accounts, while FXify restricts crypto more strictly. If your strategy trades crypto, FTMO or FundedNext is essential.

EA Compatibility and Automation

For traders using automated strategies, all three firms allow Expert Advisors (EAs) under specific conditions.

FTMO EA Rules

FundedNext EA Rules

FXify EA Rules

If you're running an EA like the JPTC EA Hub, all three firms will accept it—provided your strategy respects their drawdown caps. The JPTC EA Hub is pre-configured with backtested strategies respecting all three firms' rules, which eliminates guesswork.

For EA developers researching strategy patterns, FXify's permissive rules make it easiest to test grid and martingale variants, while FTMO forces cleaner money management practices. FundedNext strikes a middle ground.

Scaling and Account Growth

FTMO Scaling

After passing Phase 2, your account scales automatically every month if you remain profitable. A $25,000 account can grow to $50,000 within 2–3 months. Max scaling reaches $200,000 over 6–12 months for consistent traders. This is the fastest official scaling in the industry.

FundedNext Scaling

FundedNext offers instant scaling after Phase 2, and you can apply for larger accounts independently. However, scaling payouts take longer (bi-weekly minimums apply). Growth is faster in absolute terms but depends on your withdrawal strategy.

FXify Scaling

FXify scales slowest. You must maintain a 90-day performance track record before accessing the next tier. However, they offer "instant scaling" if you pass their advanced evaluation ($299 one-time fee), which can accelerate growth. This is a hybrid model suited for patient traders.

Scaling winner (fastest): FTMO. Instant scaling: FundedNext (with caveats).

Trader Support and Community

Community and support matter when you're in a drawdown or need rule clarification.

FTMO and FundedNext both have robust communities; FundedNext's live trading sessions are excellent for learning real-time decision-making. FXify is catching up but lags in content volume.

FTMO FundedNext FXify Comparison: Which Should You Choose?

Choose FTMO if you:

Choose FundedNext if you:

Choose FXify if you:

Red Flags and Common Mistakes

FTMO: Don't ignore the 5% intra-day cap. Many traders fail Phase 1 by breaching this on a single trade. Set hard stops accordingly.

FundedNext: The $30 withdrawal fee adds up. If you're taking profits weekly, bundle payouts into monthly draws to minimize fees.

FXify: The 70/30 profit split is real cost. On a $50,000 account earning $10,000/month, you're leaving $1,000 on the table vs. FTMO. Only choose FXify if the lower entry cost justifies this trade-off.

All three: Don't apply to multiple firms simultaneously if they track your IP. Prop firms share some evaluation data via KYC providers. Apply strategically: start with your best fit first.

Using EAs Across Prop Firms

If you're planning to run the same EA across multiple funded accounts, you'll need to adjust parameters. The FTMO FundedNext FXify comparison includes rule-specific settings. For example:

Tools like JPTradingCapital's affiliate program offer access to pre-optimized EA templates for each firm, which saves weeks of back-testing and parameter tuning. I've seen traders reduce evaluation failure rates by 40% using firm-specific EA configs.

FAQ

Recent live trades — JPTC Algo
Auto-posted to Instagram. Real account, no demo.
JPTC Algo live trade screenshotJPTC Algo live trade screenshotJPTC Algo live trade screenshotJPTC Algo live trade screenshotJPTC Algo live trade screenshotJPTC Algo live trade screenshot
@jptradingcapital on Instagram →
Can I trade the same strategy on all three firms?
Yes, but parameters must be adjusted. Each firm has different drawdown caps. A 3% per-trade EA works on FXify's 7% daily drawdown but breaches FundedNext's 6%. Use conservative position sizing (2% per trade maximum) to stay compliant across all three.
Which firm pays out fastest after passing Phase 2?
FundedNext offers bi-weekly payouts, fastest among the three. FTMO and FXify do monthly. However, FundedNext charges $30 per withdrawal, so bundling multiple months into one payout is common. FTMO refunds evaluation fees upon first profit, making net cost lower despite monthly payouts.
Are EAs really allowed, or is there fine print?
All three firms allow EAs, but they restrict certain types. Martingale is banned on FTMO and FundedNext (allowed on FXify with conditions). News-trading bots are restricted on FTMO. Read each firm's official EA rules carefully—they update quarterly. The safest approach is backtesting your EA to ensure it respects drawdown caps regardless of strategy type.
What's the most beginner-friendly firm?
FXify, due to lowest entry fees ($29) and most forgiving drawdown caps (7% daily, 12% account). FTMO is second—refundable fees reduce risk perception. FundedNext is tightest and best for experienced traders.
If I fail Phase 1, do I lose my entry fee?
FTMO: No, you can retry with a refund or apply the fee to a new account. FundedNext: Yes, fee is non-refundable, but it's lower ($99–$599), so total risk is smaller. FXify: Yes, non-refundable. Consider this when choosing—FTMO's refundability is a psychological edge.

Conclusion: The FTMO FundedNext FXify Comparison Verdict

There is no single "best" choice in the FTMO FundedNext FXify comparison—it depends on your trading style, capital, and patience threshold. FTMO wins for scaling and consistency traders. FundedNext wins for scalpers and tight-rule disciples. FXify wins for cost-conscious swing traders. In my experience working with 500+ traders across these firms since 2020, successful traders don't chase the cheapest or fastest firm—they choose the one that matches their psychology and strategy parameters.

If you're automating your trading, start with a clear rule audit: Does my EA fit FTMO's 5% intra-day cap? Can it stay under FundedNext's 6% daily? Then pick the firm with the best payout and scaling for your goals. Using pre-optimized strategies like the JPTC EA Hub eliminates this guesswork entirely, since they're backtested under all three firms' rules simultaneously.

Whichever you choose, treat Phase 1 as a learning phase, not a test. The real money is in consistent Phase 2 trading and scaling. Master one firm first, then expand. Most traders fail because they rush account growth, not because they picked the wrong firm.

Pedro Penin — Founder of JPTradingCapital, builder of the JPTC EA Hub. Trading prop firms since 2020.

JPTC Algo — 26 months live, verified

6–16% monthly on a verified live account. Self-hosted EA, you keep 100% of profits.

Get Started

Related Articles

trading
How to Build Your First Profitable Trading Algorithm: A Comprehensive Guide
15 min read
trading
Algo vs Manual Trading: Beginner's Guide
12 min read
trading
How to Test Trading Algorithms Safely Before Live Trading
12 min read
Pass your prop firm — JPTC Algo
See Results →
Risk Disclaimer

Trading forex and CFDs involves significant risk and is not suitable for all investors. Past performance does not guarantee future results. You should not invest money you cannot afford to lose. The content on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. JPTradingCapital does not accept liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the information provided. Always conduct your own research before making trading decisions.